|
1
|
- Rachael Perkins Arenstein, Aaron Crayne, Neil Duncan,
- Lisa Kronthal, Athena LaTocha, Scott Merritt,
- Chris Norris & George Ramos
|
|
2
|
- Record the results of pest trapping
- Associate results with building features
- Doors
- Windows
- Gaps or cracks in walls, floors
- Map results onto building floor plans
- Relate to environmental preferences of pest species
|
|
3
|
- Computer Assisted Design (CAD) & Information Management program
- PROS
- Used by AMNH construction
- Has floor plans for whole Museum
- Powerful underlying database to store results
|
|
4
|
- CONS
- Very expensive
- Requires trained operator
- Not very visual
|
|
5
|
- Cheaper
- Easier to use
- Likely to be more widely used
|
|
6
|
- Widely available in AMNH
- Widely available to other institutions
- Experienced in its use
- Reasonably priced
|
|
7
|
- What was caught?
- Species, life stage, pest or predator
- When was it caught?
- Trap surroundings?
- Near walls, doors, windows, specimens, inside cabinets, etc.
- What does it tell us?
- Environmental preferences
|
|
8
|
- Date of capture
- Species
- Environmental preferences
- Room
- Trap
- Room features
|
|
9
|
- Visually on a floor plan
- Visually using charts
- Proportional (e.g. pie chart)
- Quantified (e.g. bar chart, column chart)
- Raw data in tables
|
|
10
|
- Access Database
- Data queried via form
- Query results displayed as…
- Embedded bitmap floor plan
- Column chart (generated using MS Excel)
- Data table
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Department of Mammalogy Building 17
- Self-contained facility
- 5 collection rooms
- Prep lab & dermestid colony
- Problematic HVAC system
- 109 traps
- 20 months of data
|
|
18
|
- Time intensive to collect data
- Trap placement & pick-up
- Identification of captured insects
- Inputting data into database
- Database has helped to pin-point localized problems
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- History of Research Branch facility
- Collaboration with AMNH
- Database modifications
- Bar coding & scanning
- Image database
- Future developments
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Used at RB & CRC
- Categorizes captures
- Occasional invaders
- Environmental indicators
- Museum pests
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- NMAI committed to:
- Troubleshooting & adapting program
- Developing barcoding data entry system
- Creating image database
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Recorded times for bi-monthly monitoring
- Retrieving traps
- Making & Placing new traps
- Identifying captures
- Inputting data
- 19.5 hours average with Excel spreadsheet
- 16 hours average with PMD
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Trap name
- Pest common name
- Quantity
- Lifestage
- Dust Cover
|
|
43
|
- Pros
- Microscope
- Good lighting
- More space to work
- Cons
- Less convenient
- More time consuming?
- Risk of something crawling off trap
|
|
44
|
- Pros
- Convenient
- Fast
- Less messy
- Cons
- Poor lighting
- Lower magnification
- Possibly less accurate
- Less space to work
|
|
45
|
- Compaq iPAQ 3630
- ISC Socket in-hand scan card attachment & accessories
- Pros
- Cons
- Hard to direct laser
- Added extra step
|
|
46
|
- Wasp Bar Code Wand
- Reader & Decoder
- Wasp Bar Code USBi interface
- Pros
- Cons
- Low resolution
- Unreliable scans
|
|
47
|
- Symbol LS400i Triggered Laser Scanner
- 650 nm laser & working range of 16 in.
- Pros
- Cons
- Expensive
- Features like good working range unnecessary
|
|
48
|
- Symbol CCD (charge coupled device) scanner
- Pros
- Quick & easy to use despite limited depth of field
- Reasonably priced
|
|
49
|
- Create a worksheet for common entries
- Self-adhesive barcode labels for sticky traps
|
|
50
|
- Code 39
- Pros
- Widely used and supported by readers
- Cons
- Less dense – longer barcodes
- Does not always support full character set
- Code 128
- Pros
- Capable of high density barcodes
- Supports full ASCII 128 character set
- Cons
- Not readable by all scanners
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
- Associated data to explain context of pest captures
- Increasing data manageability
- Better visualization of trends
- Customizable for different facilities
|
|
61
|
- Survey of interest in databases for pest management
- IPM list serve for discussion and updates on future developments
- Send e-mail to listserve@zaks.com
- In body of message type “subscribe pmd your_full_name”
|